ISOCPP liaison List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Friday, 27 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Cranmer, Joshua
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Jens Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Corentin
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Corentin
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Timur Doumler

Thursday, 26 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Jonathan Wakely
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Thomas Köppe
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 JeanHeyd Meneide
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Jens Maurer
[wg14/wg21 liaison] nullptr + 0 Robert Seacord
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Jₑₙₛ Gustedt

Wednesday, 25 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Joseph Myers
[wg14/wg21 liaison] WG14 feelings about F-strings for C Niall Douglas
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns

Wednesday, 18 October 2023

[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 - part 2 Nina Dinka Ranns
[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2 Nina Dinka Ranns

Tuesday, 17 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns

Monday, 16 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns

Wednesday, 11 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns
[wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 discussion on two proposed syntax options for WG21 Contracts Nina Dinka Ranns
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Nina Dinka Ranns

Monday, 9 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Joseph Myers
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Joseph Myers

Sunday, 8 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker

Saturday, 7 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler

Friday, 6 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Maurer
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jₑₙₛ Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jₑₙₛ Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Jens Gustedt
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Niall Douglas
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker

Thursday, 5 October 2023

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Ville Voutilainen
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? JeanHeyd Meneide
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Martin Uecker
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Niall Douglas
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Aaron Ballman
Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Robert Seacord
[wg14/wg21 liaison] P2961R1 syntax for Contracts: viable for C? Timur Doumler

Last message date: 2023-10-27 20:45:04