C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] SG22 meeting - 27th of October, 12:00 EDT/18:00 UTC+2

From: Nina Dinka Ranns <dinka.ranns_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:43:59 +0100
Hi all,

in preparation for the discussion on Friday, these are the questions that
the Contracts Study Group would like to get feedback on and the questions
we will ask in the call :

1. Is there interest in standardising Contracts for C in a way that is
compatible with the Contracts for C++ feature that we are currently
designing in SG21? (P2900R1 <https://wg21.link/p2900r1>)

2. Is there any preference, from the C perspective, for choosing the syntax
proposed in P2935R3 <https://wg21.link/p2935r3> ("attribute-like syntax")
or the syntax proposed in P2961R1 <https://wg21.link/p2961r1> ("natural
syntax") for this feature?

3. Are there any C-specific technical concerns with either of these two
syntax proposals?

See you virtually on Friday,

On Wed, 18 Oct 2023 at 17:53, Nina Dinka Ranns <dinka.ranns_at_[hidden]>

> Hi all,
> we will have an SG22 discussion of the two currently proposed C++ Contract
> syntax options on Friday, the 27th of October at 12:00 EDT/17:00 BST/18:00
> UTC+2
> Zoom details :
> https://iso.zoom.us/j/96163983943?pwd=ZXpTRmVWb0oweGx3b0gwYzBaeEdqZz09
> You should be able to join via the link without a passcode. I will send
> the passcode in a separate email.
> Please do not publicly share the link as this is an ISO meeting and only
> open to the ISO members.
> Whether you already gave feedback on this mailing list or not, we would
> appreciate your participation in the meeting. It allows us to better
> reflect the views and opinions of SG22 members (more specifically, those
> involved in WG14), and to get a more accurate feeling of what the group
> thinks.
> The papers we will discuss are :
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2935R3.pdf
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2961R1.pdf
> Any questions, please let me know.
> Best,
> Nina

Received on 2023-10-25 14:44:11