Tuesday, 30 March 2021
Monday, 29 March 2021
- Re: Declarative C++ proposal
- Re: Declarative C++ proposal
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
Sunday, 28 March 2021
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Re: Named return values revival
- Named return values revival
Saturday, 27 March 2021
Thursday, 25 March 2021
- rename C++20 borrowed_subrange_t to borrowed_common_subrange_t
- Re: C++ becomes ++C april fools' day proposal
- Re: C++ becomes ++C april fools' day proposal
- Re: C++ becomes ++C april fools' day proposal
Wednesday, 24 March 2021
Tuesday, 23 March 2021
Sunday, 21 March 2021
- Re: Shouldn't this context be unevaluated?
- Re: Forward declaration of concepts
- Re: Forward declaration of concepts
- Re: Forward declaration of concepts
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: Forward declaration of concepts
- Re: Forward declaration of concepts
- Forward declaration of concepts
- Re: std::max_format_size pre-proposal
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
Saturday, 20 March 2021
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Shouldn't this context be unevaluated?
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: A new qualifier for "uniquely referable" object
- Re: Argument deduction for non-static class members
- Re: std::max_format_size pre-proposal
- std::max_format_size pre-proposal
- Argument deduction for non-static class members
Friday, 19 March 2021
Thursday, 18 March 2021
- Re: A new qualifier for "uniquely referable" object
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: A new qualifier for "uniquely referable" object
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: A new qualifier for "uniquely referable" object
- A new qualifier for "uniquely referable" object
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: [External] New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
Wednesday, 17 March 2021
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- Re: New "static_virtual" keyword
- New "static_virtual" keyword
Saturday, 13 March 2021
Friday, 12 March 2021
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
Thursday, 11 March 2021
- Re: New attribute for experimental features
- New attribute for experimental features
- Re: Automatic export literals operators into global scope when the header is included
- Re: Automatic export literals operators into global scope when the header is included
- Re: Automatic export literals operators into global scope when the header is included
- Automatic export literals operators into global scope when the header is included
Wednesday, 10 March 2021
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- Re: ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict
- ranges::set_intersection and ranges::set_difference requirements are too strict