C++ Logo


Advanced search

any_invocable name

From: Bjorn Reese <breese_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 09:18:47 +0100
This is not a bike-shedding mail per se, but an inquery into a bike-

The P0288 any_invocable proposal [1] has cause some naming discussions,
such as P2265, which is tracked at [2].

There were originally two proposals, both of which called it
unique_function, but some are strongly against that name. My question
is, what are the arguments against the unique_function name?

[1] http://wg21.link/P0288
[2] https://github.com/cplusplus/papers/issues/958

Received on 2021-03-19 03:20:53