Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 12:25:49 -0400
On 3/20/21 12:13 PM, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 17:54, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> And that's why deduction probably shouldn't happen with class members
>> like that. It's not a matter of whether it's possible to specify in
>> the standard; it's a matter of whether it's a good idea to permit it.
>>
>> And there are good arguments why it shouldn't be.
>>
>> So it's better to be stricter than stuck down the road with an allowance you can't revert...
> See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3897.html
But my take is we should enable it for clarity because decltype(...) is
quite ugly.
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021 at 17:54, Phil Bouchard via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> And that's why deduction probably shouldn't happen with class members
>> like that. It's not a matter of whether it's possible to specify in
>> the standard; it's a matter of whether it's a good idea to permit it.
>>
>> And there are good arguments why it shouldn't be.
>>
>> So it's better to be stricter than stuck down the road with an allowance you can't revert...
> See http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n3897.html
But my take is we should enable it for clarity because decltype(...) is
quite ugly.
-- *Phil Bouchard* Founder C.: (819) 328-4743 Fornux Logo <http://www.fornux.com>
Received on 2021-03-20 11:25:53