ISOCPP Std Discussion List: By Thread

	STD-DISCUSSION
To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Date view	Subject view	Author view
Previous Folder, Thread view	Next Folder, Thread view	List of Folders

61 Messages
Starting:	2019-04-15 16:29:33	Ending:	2021-04-22 02:50:58

Old-style casts and prvalue materialization alternatives to reinterpret_cast Edward Catmur (2021-03-29 02:31:13)
requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering tobi_at_[hidden] (2021-03-28 07:10:03)
- Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering Edward Catmur (2021-03-28 07:44:00)
  - Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering LÃ©nÃ¡rd Szolnoki (2021-03-29 03:39:28)
    - Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering tobi_at_[hidden] (2021-03-29 04:46:08)
Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? Vladimir Grigoriev (2021-03-26 13:32:43)
- Re: Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? Vladimir Grigoriev (2021-03-26 13:47:44)
  - Re: Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? Vladimir Grigoriev (2021-03-27 04:35:48)
Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects Jason McKesson (2021-03-25 21:18:05)
- Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects language.lawyer_at_[hidden] (2021-03-25 21:28:06)
  - Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects Jason McKesson (2021-03-25 21:59:05)
    - Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects Jason McKesson (2021-03-25 22:09:31)
      - Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects language.lawyer_at_[hidden] (2021-03-25 22:45:25)
equality compare reference_wrapper Bernard (2021-03-25 20:31:47)
- Re: equality compare reference_wrapper Bo Persson (2021-03-26 01:12:03)
  - Re: equality compare reference_wrapper Richard Hodges (2021-03-26 03:07:00)
Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments Omer Rosler (2021-03-21 15:24:05)
- Re: Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments Thiago Macieira (2021-03-21 16:09:36)
  - Re: Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments Omer Rosler (2021-03-21 17:06:08)
Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules MichaÅ‚ Policht (2021-03-18 09:24:42)
- Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules Jason McKesson (2021-03-18 09:52:38)
- Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules Boris Kolpackov (2021-03-19 07:46:19)
Missing changes in P0012R1 v.S. F. (2021-03-17 03:05:31)
- Re: Missing changes in P0012R1 Jason McKesson (2021-03-17 09:56:24)
Two issues about the description of the instantiation of fold-expression in [temp.variadic] jim x (2021-03-08 02:04:39)
- Re: Two issues about the description of the instantiation of fold-expression in [temp.variadic] Andrew Schepler (2021-03-14 00:07:35)
Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Vishal Oza (2021-03-06 11:53:46)
- Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Jason McKesson (2021-03-06 13:34:36)
  - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Thiago Macieira (2021-03-06 16:00:06)
    - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware David Bakin (2021-03-06 16:04:55)
    - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Vishal Oza (2021-03-06 17:57:27)
  - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Andrey Semashev (2021-03-07 03:13:54)
    - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Jason McKesson (2021-03-07 09:26:06)
      - Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Andrey Semashev (2021-03-07 09:52:26)
        
        Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware LÃ©nÃ¡rd Szolnoki (2021-03-07 11:09:06)
        
        Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Andrey Semashev (2021-03-07 12:59:25)
        
        Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware Jason McKesson (2021-03-07 14:59:16)
Do char arrays provide storage only for implicitly created objects? v.S. F. (2021-03-04 23:29:15)
Nested class declaration. Vladimir Grigoriev (2021-03-04 15:07:14)
- Re: Nested class declaration. Andrew Schepler (2021-03-04 18:34:00)
- Re: Nested class declaration. Vishal Oza (2021-03-04 20:10:27)
Overloading a virtual function with a non-virtual function with a requires-clause v.S. F. (2021-03-03 10:50:03)
- Re: Overloading a virtual function with a non-virtual function with a requires-clause Tom Honermann (2021-03-03 12:26:00)
Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Bell, Ian H. (Fed) (2021-03-03 08:05:45)
- Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) will wray (2021-03-03 09:29:52)
  - Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Peter Sommerlad (C++) (2021-03-03 09:48:25)
    - Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Peter Sommerlad (C++) (2021-03-03 10:01:34)
      - Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Mark Hoemmen (2021-03-03 10:57:30)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Bell, Ian H. (Fed) (2021-03-03 10:59:03)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Marcin Jaczewski (2021-03-03 11:50:22)
      - Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Herring, Davis (2021-03-03 13:25:12)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Bell, Ian H. (Fed) (2021-03-03 13:52:27)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Peter C++ (2021-03-03 14:02:38)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Mark Hoemmen (2021-03-03 16:31:52)
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Bell, Ian H. (Fed) (2021-03-03 16:37:05)
        
        Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Herring, Davis (2021-03-04 11:56:08)
- Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) Hyman Rosen (2021-03-03 16:04:45)
Slight inconsistency in naming sections in member functions of some classes in the standard Semushin Sergey (2021-03-01 11:57:05)

Last message date:	2021-04-22 02:50:58	Archived on:	2021-04-22 02:51:05 CDT

Date view	Subject view	Author view
Previous Folder, Thread view	Next Folder, Thread view	List of Folders

STD-DISCUSSION list run by std-discussion-owner@lists.isocpp.org

Older Archives on Google Groups