ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Andrew Schepler

Re: Two issues about the description of the instantiation of fold-expression in [temp.variadic] (2021-03-14 06:07:35)
Re: Nested class declaration. (2021-03-05 00:34:00)

Andrey Semashev

Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 18:59:25)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 15:52:26)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 09:17:14)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 09:13:54)

Bell, Ian H. (Fed)

Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 22:37:05)
Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 19:52:27)
Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 16:59:03)
Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 14:05:45)

Bernard

equality compare reference_wrapper (2021-03-26 01:31:47)

Bo Persson

Re: equality compare reference_wrapper (2021-03-26 06:12:03)

Boris Kolpackov

Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules (2021-03-19 12:46:19)

David Bakin

Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 00:32:51)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-06 22:04:55)

Edward Catmur

Old-style casts and prvalue materialization alternatives to reinterpret_cast (2021-03-29 07:31:13)
Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering (2021-03-28 12:44:00)

Herring, Davis

Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-04 17:56:08)
Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 19:25:12)

Hyman Rosen

Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 22:04:45)

Jason McKesson

Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects (2021-03-26 03:09:31)
Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects (2021-03-26 02:59:05)
Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects (2021-03-26 02:18:05)
Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules (2021-03-18 14:52:38)
Re: Missing changes in P0012R1 (2021-03-17 14:56:24)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 20:59:16)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 15:26:06)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-06 19:34:36)

jim x

Two issues about the description of the instantiation of fold-expression in [temp.variadic] (2021-03-08 08:04:39)

language.lawyer_at

Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects (2021-03-26 03:45:25)
Re: Implicit object creation, arrays, and non-implicit lifetime objects (2021-03-26 02:28:06)

Lénárd Szolnoki

Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering (2021-03-29 08:39:28)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 17:09:06)

Marcin Jaczewski

Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 17:50:22)

Mark Hoemmen

Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 22:31:52)
Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 16:57:30)

Michał Policht

Re: [std-proposals] We should use existing scientific research in building C++ modules (2021-03-18 14:24:42)

Omer Rosler

Re: Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments (2021-03-21 22:06:08)
Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments (2021-03-21 20:24:05)

Peter C++

Re: [isocpp-sci] Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 20:02:38)

Peter Sommerlad (C++)

Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 16:01:34)
Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 15:48:25)

Richard Hodges

Re: equality compare reference_wrapper (2021-03-26 08:07:00)

Semushin Sergey

Slight inconsistency in naming sections in member functions of some classes in the standard (2021-03-01 17:57:05)

Thiago Macieira

Re: Difference between alias and non alias template when binding to template template arguments (2021-03-21 21:09:36)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-07 01:46:08)
Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-06 22:00:06)

tobi_at

Re: requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering (2021-03-29 09:46:08)
requires-clause, pack expansion and constraints-ordering (2021-03-28 12:10:03)

Tom Honermann

Re: Overloading a virtual function with a non-virtual function with a requires-clause (2021-03-03 18:26:00)

v.S. F.

Missing changes in P0012R1 (2021-03-17 08:05:31)
Do char arrays provide storage only for implicitly created objects? (2021-03-05 05:29:15)
Overloading a virtual function with a non-virtual function with a requires-clause (2021-03-03 16:50:03)

Vishal Oza

Re: Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-06 23:57:27)
Setting wording for bit manipulation for non-binary hardware (2021-03-06 17:53:46)
Re: Nested class declaration. (2021-03-05 02:10:27)

Vladimir Grigoriev

Re: Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? (2021-03-27 09:35:48)
Re: Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? (2021-03-26 18:47:44)
Should the constructor of std::reference_wrapper be explicit? (2021-03-26 18:32:43)
Nested class declaration. (2021-03-04 21:07:14)

will wray

Re: Problems with pow(std::complex<T>, double) (2021-03-03 15:29:52)

Last message date: 2021-03-29 09:46:08