ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Wednesday, 27 November 2019

Re: Trailing requires-clauses on destructors Andrey Davydov
Trailing requires-clauses on destructors Myria
Re: Unnecessary clause in std::variant Nevin Liber
Unnecessary clause in std::variant Myria

Friday, 22 November 2019

Operator <=> polymorphy Hans Åberg

Monday, 18 November 2019

Re: Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? Gennaro Prota

Saturday, 16 November 2019

Re: The using declaration and function default arguments. Andrew Schepler
Re: Elements of an aggregate in C++ 20. Andrew Schepler

Friday, 15 November 2019

Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Thiago Macieira
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Brian Bi
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Thiago Macieira
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Tam S. B.
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Brian Bi
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Thiago Macieira
Understanding CWG 1396 Brian Ehlert
How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? Brian Bi
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Thiago Macieira
Elements of an aggregate in C++ 20. Vladimir Grigoriev
The using declaration and function default arguments. Vladimir Grigoriev
Re: Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? Andrey Semashev
Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? Gennaro Prota

Thursday, 14 November 2019

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Thiago Macieira
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier

Tuesday, 12 November 2019

Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Vishal Oza
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state Gennaro Prota
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Vishal Oza
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Andrew Tomazos
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Andrew Schepler
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Vishal Oza

Monday, 11 November 2019

Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values Edward Diener
enabling default keyword for default method and function values Vishal Oza

Saturday, 9 November 2019

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Lyberta
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Bo Persson
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Thiago Macieira
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Thiago Macieira
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Lyberta
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Lyberta
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Andrey Semashev
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Peter C++
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Lyberta
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Thiago Macieira

Friday, 8 November 2019

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Nevin Liber
Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? Wilhelm Meier

Thursday, 7 November 2019

Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Thiago Macieira
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state Gennaro Prota
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state Bo Persson
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Shachar Shemesh
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state Gennaro Prota

Wednesday, 6 November 2019

Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Michael Spencer
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Thiago Macieira
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Brian Bi
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Thiago Macieira
Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? Brian Bi
Fwd: A defect in the section 9.7.1.2 Namespace member definitions of the Standard Draft #N4820 Vladimir Grigoriev
A defect in the section 9.7.1.2 Namespace member definitions of the Standard Draft #N4820 Vladimir Grigoriev

Sunday, 3 November 2019

Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state Gennaro Prota
pmr::*_pool_resource: specifying exact list of block sizes? Marc Mutz

Saturday, 2 November 2019

Friday, 1 November 2019

Re: Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ construct Tam S. B.
Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ construct Edward Diener

Last message date: 2019-11-27 07:09:01