ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Andrew Schepler

Re: The using declaration and function default arguments. (2019-11-16 04:23:06)
Re: Elements of an aggregate in C++ 20. (2019-11-16 04:04:06)
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-12 03:29:36)

Andrew Tomazos

Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-12 04:03:18)

Andrey Davydov

Re: Trailing requires-clauses on destructors (2019-11-27 07:09:01)

Andrey Semashev

Re: Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? (2019-11-15 10:40:05)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 08:41:30)

Bo Persson

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 16:14:37)
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state (2019-11-07 12:04:13)

Brian Bi

Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 21:54:46)
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 21:00:44)
How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 18:26:41)
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-06 22:37:59)
Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-06 22:21:29)
Re: Is an implementation required to define an unneeded, implicitly declared as defaulted, virtual destructor? (2019-11-02 20:29:23)

Brian Ehlert

Understanding CWG 1396 (2019-11-15 18:56:19)

Edward Diener

Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-11 23:28:21)
Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ construct (2019-11-01 07:12:39)

Gennaro Prota

Re: Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? (2019-11-18 08:09:38)
Why wrapping into a struct for aligned_storage::type? (2019-11-15 10:32:03)
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state (2019-11-12 10:51:27)
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state (2019-11-07 14:23:48)
Re: Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state (2019-11-07 10:52:05)
Setting badbit when outputting to an unopened fstream in eof state (2019-11-03 20:23:53)

Hans Åberg

Operator <=> polymorphy (2019-11-22 13:19:49)

Lyberta

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 23:07:00)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 10:30:00)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 08:52:00)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 03:45:00)

Marc Mutz

pmr::*_pool_resource: specifying exact list of block sizes? (2019-11-03 16:15:57)

Mark Stegeman

Is an implementation required to define an unneeded, implicitly declared as defaulted, virtual destructor? (2019-11-02 14:15:41)

Michael Spencer

Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-06 23:38:14)

Myria

Trailing requires-clauses on destructors (2019-11-27 04:26:43)
Unnecessary clause in std::variant (2019-11-27 00:49:14)
Re: Is an implementation required to define an unneeded, implicitly declared as defaulted, virtual destructor? (2019-11-02 14:40:20)

Nevin Liber

Re: Unnecessary clause in std::variant (2019-11-27 01:00:12)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-08 11:37:19)

Peter C++

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 07:27:34)

Shachar Shemesh

Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-07 11:17:15)

Tam S. B.

Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 21:31:47)
Re: Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ construct (2019-11-01 07:29:06)

Thiago Macieira

Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 22:01:40)
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 21:53:23)
Re: How do I know whether a call to a constexpr standard library function is actually a constant expression? (2019-11-15 20:58:42)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-15 15:48:05)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-14 15:42:16)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 16:03:21)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 16:01:48)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 00:58:28)
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-07 14:59:57)
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-06 22:49:56)
Re: Did the standard committee vote to make integer comparisons do the right thing? (2019-11-06 22:31:27)

Vishal Oza

Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-12 13:41:37)
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-12 06:16:58)
Re: enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-12 03:19:10)
enabling default keyword for default method and function values (2019-11-11 16:00:09)

Vladimir Grigoriev

Elements of an aggregate in C++ 20. (2019-11-15 13:00:35)
The using declaration and function default arguments. (2019-11-15 12:47:56)
Fwd: A defect in the section 9.7.1.2 Namespace member definitions of the Standard Draft #N4820 (2019-11-06 15:26:16)
A defect in the section 9.7.1.2 Namespace member definitions of the Standard Draft #N4820 (2019-11-06 15:05:19)

Wilhelm Meier

Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-14 19:11:40)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-14 06:29:30)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 11:41:58)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 09:44:25)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 07:45:03)
Re: Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-09 07:23:59)
Why is size_type in std::array an alias for size_t? (2019-11-08 06:46:22)

Last message date: 2019-11-27 07:09:01