ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by author

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Andrew Schepler

Re: Seeking a better constexpr (2019-10-14 12:09:49)
Re: std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. (2019-10-09 03:05:57)

Andrew Tomazos

Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions (2019-10-02 07:31:48)

Andrey Semashev

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-22 15:14:18)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-22 07:14:52)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 17:33:02)

Brian Bi

Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace (2019-10-24 22:53:47)

Christopher Head

Re: Explicit instantiation declarations and requires clauses (2019-10-22 05:07:55)

Edward Diener

Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ (2019-10-31 21:27:15)

Giuseppe D'Angelo

Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 07:38:24)

J.A. Belloc

Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-14 19:36:11)
Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-10 13:08:21)

Jason Cobb

Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-10 14:49:39)

Jeremy Ong

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 07:44:24)
Re: Seeking a better constexpr (2019-10-14 15:19:30)
Seeking a better constexpr (2019-10-14 04:57:40)

John.Adriaan_at_[hidden]

Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions (2019-10-01 11:25:51)

Kevin Bracey

Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) (2019-10-24 08:02:34)
Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) (2019-10-23 16:58:50)

Krystian Stasiowski

Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace (2019-10-24 23:53:42)
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-14 19:41:40)
Re: Lifetime of references (2019-10-11 16:38:29)
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-10 15:12:28)
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? (2019-10-10 14:25:22)

language.lawyer_at

Re: Lifetime of references (2019-10-11 21:26:01)
Lifetime of references (2019-10-11 16:33:30)

Michael Spencer

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 19:54:03)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 18:33:57)
Re: Seeking a better constexpr (2019-10-14 18:10:57)

Ryan Nicholl

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 18:41:43)

Tadeus Prastowo

Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions (2019-10-01 20:23:29)

Thiago Macieira

Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) (2019-10-24 20:02:11)
Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) (2019-10-24 06:04:47)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-22 15:52:37)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-22 15:00:20)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-22 05:05:32)
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? (2019-10-21 15:36:53)

Vladimir Grigoriev

A contradiction in the description of the enclosed namespace (2019-10-25 11:33:55)
Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace (2019-10-23 18:11:47)
std::valarray<T>::resize (2019-10-11 11:42:23)
std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. (2019-10-08 15:41:04)

Last message date: 2019-10-31 21:27:15