Subject: Re: Seeking a better constexpr
From: Andrew Schepler (aschepler_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-10-14 07:09:49
On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 12:58 AM Jeremy Ong via Std-Discussion <
> - Proposal: introduce a new function signature decorator called
> `consteval` (in the spirit of the variable consteval decorator) which is an
> input into overload resolution.
The draft `consteval` is already a function specifier and is not a variable
specifier. I haven't looked at it in detail, but I think it does much of
what you want, except overloading and allowing non-constexpr calls.
Basically, it demands the evaluation of every call to the function must
happen at compile time.
STD-DISCUSSION list run by herb.sutter at gmail.com
Older Archives on Google Groups