ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Thursday, 31 October 2019

Interpretation of __VA_OPT__ Edward Diener

Friday, 25 October 2019

A contradiction in the description of the enclosed namespace Vladimir Grigoriev

Thursday, 24 October 2019

Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Krystian Stasiowski
Re: Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Brian Bi
Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Thiago Macieira
Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Kevin Bracey
Re: Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Thiago Macieira

Wednesday, 23 October 2019

Extending a namespace in an inline namespace that initially was defined in the enclosing namespace of the inline namespace Vladimir Grigoriev
Destruction order of statically-initialized objects (like std::mutex) Kevin Bracey

Tuesday, 22 October 2019

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev
Re: Explicit instantiation declarations and requires clauses Christopher Head
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira

Monday, 21 October 2019

Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Michael Spencer
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Ryan Nicholl
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Michael Spencer
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Andrey Semashev
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Thiago Macieira
Re: Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Jeremy Ong
Should std::atomic<T*> have operator->? Giuseppe D'Angelo

Monday, 14 October 2019

Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? J.A. Belloc
Re: Seeking a better constexpr Michael Spencer
Re: Seeking a better constexpr Jeremy Ong
Re: Seeking a better constexpr Andrew Schepler
Seeking a better constexpr Jeremy Ong

Friday, 11 October 2019

Re: Lifetime of references language.lawyer_at
Re: Lifetime of references Krystian Stasiowski
Lifetime of references language.lawyer_at
std::valarray<T>::resize Vladimir Grigoriev

Thursday, 10 October 2019

Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Jason Cobb
Re: Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? Krystian Stasiowski
Does [expr.call]/1 correctly authorize the snippet below to compile? J.A. Belloc

Wednesday, 9 October 2019

Re: std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. Andrew Schepler

Tuesday, 8 October 2019

std::valarray<T>: deduction guide. Vladimir Grigoriev

Wednesday, 2 October 2019

Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions Andrew Tomazos

Tuesday, 1 October 2019

Re: Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions Tadeus Prastowo
Syntax of pointers to functions, members, and member functions John.Adriaan_at_[hidden]

Last message date: 2019-10-31 21:27:15