Wednesday, 30 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
Tuesday, 22 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
Monday, 21 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
- [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?
Friday, 18 March 2022
Wednesday, 16 March 2022
- [wg14/wg21 liaison] Invitation: ISO C++ SG22 (C and C++ Compatibility)
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Summertime SG22 Schedule
Friday, 11 March 2022
Wednesday, 9 March 2022
Monday, 7 March 2022
Sunday, 6 March 2022
Saturday, 5 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] [SC22WG14.21755] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] [SC22WG14.21755] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
Friday, 4 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- [wg14/wg21 liaison] time travel
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] C and C++ Compatibility Mar Agenda
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
Thursday, 3 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
- [wg14/wg21 liaison] N2900 Initialization with {} and potential semantic divergence from C++ for new-to-C syntax
Tuesday, 1 March 2022
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Type of u8"" array elements are 'char', but u8'' is 'unsigned char' ?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Type of u8"" array elements are 'char', but u8'' is 'unsigned char' ?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Type of u8"" array elements are 'char', but u8'' is 'unsigned char' ?
- Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Type of u8"" array elements are 'char', but u8'' is 'unsigned char' ?