Reminder: this meeting is happening today, in about five hours from
now. The agenda and meeting links can be found below. Hope to see you
there!

~Aaron

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:05 AM Aaron Ballman
<compatibility.sg.chair_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Our next meeting will be on Fri Mar 04, 2022 at 18:00 UTC
> (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20220304T180000&p1=tz_pt&p2=tz_mt&p3=tz_ct&p4=tz_et&p5=1440).
>
> You can join the meeting at https://iso.zoom.us/j/5513145100
>
> **NEW PASSWORD: same as the old one, but spelled as a C reserved
> identifier instead of a C++ keyword; contact Aaron Ballman if you have
> questions **
>
> We will be discussing the following papers:
>
> P1774R5 (https://wg21.link/P2541R0) Consider renaming remove_quals
> This is a rebuttal paper for WG14 N2927
> (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n2927.htm) which was
> adopted into C2x. It proposes renaming the accepted remove_quals
> operator with a different spelling of unqual_typeof, but otherwise
> keeps the same semantics.
>
> P2215R1 (https://wg21.link/P2215R1) "Undefined behavior" and the
> concurrency memory model
> In relation to the "out of thin air" problems in SG1, this paper
> discusses what undefined behavior means in the context of concurrent
> threads. The paper provides a few possible interpretations. The author
> is looking for feedback on the alternatives, especially as it relates
> to interoperability between C and C++.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ~Aaron