C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [wg14/wg21 liaison] Comments on P2569 *_HAS_SUBNORM==0 implies what?

From: Fred J. Tydeman <tydeman_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 10:46:24 -0700 (PDT)
On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:05:56 +0000 Jonathan Wakely via Liaison wrote:
>The new denorm_min introduced by P1841 is supposed to make it unnecessary,
>but doesn't really do so, which is the subject of question 1 in P2551.
>Question 4 in P2551 is also related.

When will those questions be answered?
Will they be answered by a C++ numerics sub-group,
or the entire committee?

Based upon other emails here, C++ does not care if C
were to remove the *_HAS_SUBNORM macros.


Fred J. Tydeman        Tydeman Consulting
tydeman_at_[hidden]      Testing, numerics, programming
+1 (702) 608-6093      Vice-chair of PL22.11 (ANSI "C")
Sample C99+FPCE tests: http://www.tybor.com
Savers sleep well, investors eat well, spenders work forever.

Received on 2022-03-30 18:46:27