An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18]
A contradiction between [class.base.init#9] and [class.copy.ctor#14]
Maybe a wording defect for virtual function in the standard
Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
- Re: Making the new expression smart
Some confusion about the transformed function type during partial ordering
No attributes for concepts in C++20
The issue about the wording "member of a class"
[basic.life]/8.5 interpretation
Re: new token "not equal" "= / ="
The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack
- Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack