std-discussion

Tuesday, 29 September 2020

• Re: An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18] Johannes Schaub
• Re: An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18] Johannes Schaub
• Re: An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18] jim x

Monday, 28 September 2020

• Re: An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18] Thiago Macieira
• An confusion about the paragraph [temp.expl.spec#18] jim x

Sunday, 27 September 2020

• Re: A contradiction between [class.base.init#9] and [class.copy.ctor#14] jim x

Saturday, 26 September 2020

• Re: A contradiction between [class.base.init#9] and [class.copy.ctor#14] Andrew Schepler

Wednesday, 23 September 2020

• A contradiction between [class.base.init#9] and [class.copy.ctor#14] jim x

Tuesday, 22 September 2020

• Maybe a wording defect for virtual function in the standard jim x

Friday, 18 September 2020

• Re: Making the new expression smart Jason McKesson
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Roger Orr
• Re: Making the new expression smart Jason McKesson
• Re: Making the new expression smart Nevin Liber
• Re: Making the new expression smart Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges

Thursday, 17 September 2020

• Re: Making the new expression smart Ville Voutilainen
• Re: Making the new expression smart Christopher Head
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Christopher Head
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Christopher Head
• Re: Making the new expression smart Richard Hodges
• Re: Making the new expression smart Christopher Head
• Making the new expression smart Farid Mehrabi

Wednesday, 16 September 2020

• Some confusion about the transformed function type during partial ordering jim x
• Re: The issue about the wording "member of a class" jim x

Tuesday, 15 September 2020

• Re: The issue about the wording "member of a class" Andrew Schepler
• Re: No attributes for concepts in C++20 Ville Voutilainen
• No attributes for concepts in C++20 Jean Guegant
• The issue about the wording "member of a class" jim x

Saturday, 12 September 2020

• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation jim x

Friday, 11 September 2020

• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation jim x
• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation jim x
• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation jim x

Thursday, 10 September 2020

• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation John Mousseau
• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation language.lawyer_at
• Re: [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation jim x

Tuesday, 8 September 2020

• Re: new token "not equal" "= / =" Matthew Woehlke
• [basic.life]/8.5 interpretation John Mousseau
• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack jim x

Monday, 7 September 2020

• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack Andrew Schepler

Sunday, 6 September 2020

• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack jim x
• Re: new token "not equal" "= / =" Andrew Schepler
• Re: new token "not equal" "= / =" Илья К

Saturday, 5 September 2020

• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack Andrew Schepler
• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack Andrew Schepler
• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack jim x

Friday, 4 September 2020

• Re: The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack Andrew Schepler

Wednesday, 2 September 2020

• Re: commutative functions Tobias W.
• Re: commutative functions Matthew Woehlke
• The issue about reference collapsing for function parameter pack jim x
• why does std::basic_string comparison operator expect a string with the same allocator class Robert Behar
• Re: what is the "glvalue result" in [stmt.return] section jim x
• Re: what is the "glvalue result" in [stmt.return] section Jason McKesson
• what is the "glvalue result" in [stmt.return] section jim x

Tuesday, 1 September 2020

• Re: commutative functions Andrew Schepler
• Re: add version of std::stoi, std::stol etc that receive std::string_view Thiago Macieira
• Re: commutative functions Tobias W.
• Re: add version of std::stoi, std::stol etc that receive std::string_view Jason McKesson
• Re: Does the wording about the rule of deduction for type placeholder for a variable declaration exist a defect jim x
• Re: Does the wording about the rule of deduction for type placeholder for a variable declaration exist a defect language.lawyer_at
• Does the wording about the rule of deduction for type placeholder for a variable declaration exist a defect jim x
• add version of std::stoi, std::stol etc that receive std::string_view Robert Behar

Last message date: 2020-09-29 20:34:20