ISOCPP std-proposals List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Thursday, 14 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Simon Schröder

Wednesday, 13 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Máté Ték

Saturday, 9 May 2026

[std-proposals] Intercept inwards and outwards (tested & working on x86_64) Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Máté Ték
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Rainer Deyke

Friday, 8 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Máté Ték
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Andre Kostur
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Rainer Deyke
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Máté Ték
Re: [std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Andre Kostur
[std-proposals] #includes turning into imports breaks existing usage Rainer Deyke

Tuesday, 5 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] Gap in the Standard Library? Single-pass fused reductions (similar to Clojure transducers) Jens Maurer

Monday, 4 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Sunday, 3 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Sebastian Wittmeier
Re: [std-proposals] Translation-unit-local functions that access private class fields Rhidian De Wit
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Jens Maurer

Saturday, 2 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] "is_scoped_enum_v is not a member of std" Jonathan Wakely
[std-proposals] "is_scoped_enum_v is not a member of std" Muneem
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Simon Schröder

Friday, 1 May 2026

Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Frederick Virchanza Gotham
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Thiago Macieira
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Jonathan Wakely
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) David Brown
Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64) Frederick Virchanza Gotham

Last message date: 2026-05-14 07:21:05