C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] [[unevaluated]]

From: Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:49:05 +0100
On Wed, 20 May 2026, 09:16 Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Why not use an empty function body?
>
> Then you don't get compile errors or warnings?
>
>
>
> Or you want a warning?
>
> Then why isn't static code analysis enough?
>


If only the "proposal" had some motivation stating what it's for, and why
conditional_t<some_constant0, Some type, Some other type>
isn't usable.

We should all just ignore this unmotivated garbage, there's too much
traffic on this list that isn't about serious proposals.

Received on 2026-05-20 09:49:25