Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:49:05 +0100
On Wed, 20 May 2026, 09:16 Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals, <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why not use an empty function body?
>
> Then you don't get compile errors or warnings?
>
>
>
> Or you want a warning?
>
> Then why isn't static code analysis enough?
>
If only the "proposal" had some motivation stating what it's for, and why
conditional_t<some_constant0, Some type, Some other type>
isn't usable.
We should all just ignore this unmotivated garbage, there's too much
traffic on this list that isn't about serious proposals.
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why not use an empty function body?
>
> Then you don't get compile errors or warnings?
>
>
>
> Or you want a warning?
>
> Then why isn't static code analysis enough?
>
If only the "proposal" had some motivation stating what it's for, and why
conditional_t<some_constant0, Some type, Some other type>
isn't usable.
We should all just ignore this unmotivated garbage, there's too much
traffic on this list that isn't about serious proposals.
Received on 2026-05-20 09:49:25
