@Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]>: It's funny, asking an AI to "slop fork"
another part of the standard is easy these days... Honestly, I have strange
memories of wading through template error messages that filled half my
screen, that is the only reason I would really hate going back. I am
assuming that would be my experience of the ranges library, which is why I
haven't tried it.

@Thiago: No, now that I was told a monolithic module is the future and I
reported back with the requested numbers, I'm not sure I am suggesting
anything.

Hopefully someone from gcc saw this thread though.