C++ Logo

std-proposals

Advanced search

Re: [std-proposals] interceptor functions (tested and working on x86_64)

From: Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 20:54:56 +0000
On Friday, May 1, 2026, Thiago Macieira wrote:

>
>
> Because we *ARE* talking about cross-DLL/shared library calls.
> Intra-library
> ones can't be intercepted because they may have resolved using PC-relative
> addressing and wouldn't go through an interceptable point (the PLT or GOT).




>


Yeah I'm pretty much just suggesting this for target functions that reside
in DLL files and SO files.

Doesn't really makes sense for functions inside the process's main
executable file, because as Jonathan already demonstrated, a template
lambda works fine for that.

The Standard doesn't necessarily have to describe DLL's or SO's in order to
provide interceptor functions . . . in fact it could just talk about a
separately compiled translation unit. And a library is essentially just a
few separate translation units squished into one file (actually that's
exactly what a '.a' file is on Linux, you can rip the object files out with
'ar -x').

I emailed Lorand earlier today hoping she'd chime back in with how she'd
use this with Haskell.

Received on 2026-05-01 20:54:59