Dont wanna, won’t, defend this *thing* here but… You probably/likely know
that parsing annotations is basically parsing attributes, so hinting that
we solved ignorability by having annotations is not I think, a real rebuttal

That : the usecase is flimsy
That : there were alternatives offered
That : there is no implementations experience

All of those are somewhat rebuttal-shaped but please, not the ignorability
meme again….

Let’s focus on how unmotivated it is ?

Sent from Gmail Mobile

On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 16:31 Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 10:27, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
> Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Maybe I need to write a paper about this
>
> ..to propose annotations, which are in C++26?
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>