On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 12:25, Aurelien Cassagnes
<aurelien.cassagnes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Dont wanna, won’t, defend this *thing* here but… You probably/likely know that parsing annotations is basically parsing attributes, so hinting that we solved ignorability by having annotations is not I think, a real rebuttal

Well, I don't really care which thing is considered a rebuttal for
what by whom, but if an argument for using an attribute is that
there's
going to be attribute-like facilities that are not ignored, and
someone envisions writing a paper about such, it's perhaps worth
pointing
out that C++ already has such a facility.

All the same to me, really, though.