Sunday, 26 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval typename auto - type-returning immediate functions
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval typename auto - type-returning immediate functions
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval typename auto - type-returning immediate functions
- Re: [std-proposals] consteval typename auto - type-returning immediate functions
- [std-proposals] consteval typename auto - type-returning immediate functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
Saturday, 25 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
Friday, 24 October 2025
- [std-proposals] Consistent behavior on Container actions
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
Thursday, 23 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
Wednesday, 22 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] unified polymorphism by generic function with incomplete type
- Re: [std-proposals] unified polymorphism by generic function with incomplete type
- [std-proposals] unified polymorphism by generic function with incomplete type
Tuesday, 21 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
- [std-proposals] Proposal: template parameter values determined from Idiomatic use of decltype
- Re: [std-proposals] Forwarding Reference can also accept PRvalue (not just Lvalue or Rvalue)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forwarding Reference can also accept PRvalue (not just Lvalue or Rvalue)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forwarding Reference can also accept PRvalue (not just Lvalue or Rvalue)
- Re: [std-proposals] Forwarding Reference can also accept PRvalue (not just Lvalue or Rvalue)
Monday, 20 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- [std-proposals] Forwarding Reference can also accept PRvalue (not just Lvalue or Rvalue)
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
Sunday, 19 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- Re: [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- [std-proposals] New intrinsic type -- prvalue
- [std-proposals] Why can't string have both subview and subzview (or subcview)?
Saturday, 18 October 2025
Friday, 17 October 2025
Thursday, 16 October 2025
Tuesday, 14 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: -Wverbose-style
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: -Wverbose-style
- [std-proposals] Proposal: -Wverbose-style
Monday, 13 October 2025
Saturday, 11 October 2025
Friday, 10 October 2025
Thursday, 9 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
Wednesday, 8 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- [std-proposals] ranges::size should always return a unsigned integer
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
Tuesday, 7 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- [std-proposals] Proposal: Clarifying or Deprecating clear() in STL containers
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
Sunday, 5 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Do not accept std::generator, please.
Saturday, 4 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
Friday, 3 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
Thursday, 2 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- [std-proposals] Suggestion: non-static member variables for static-duration-only classes
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
Wednesday, 1 October 2025
- Re: [std-proposals] P3833R0a - std::unique_multilock or std::multi_lock
- Re: [std-proposals] P3833R0a - std::unique_multilock or std::multi_lock
- Re: [std-proposals] P3833R0a - std::unique_multilock or std::multi_lock
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
- Re: [std-proposals] Async Lambdas
