On Thu, Oct 30, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 29 October 2025 Frederick Virchanza Gotham wrote:
> >
> > How about if 'is_trivially_relocatable_v' were to be taken out and replaced
> > with 'relocatability_v':
>
> Write a paper and write to your National Standards Body representative to
> submit an issue against the committee draft. Anything else is pointless,
> because the language for relocatability has already been approved and merged
> into the Draft Standard.


I've attached to this email a draft HTML paper for "consteval int
relocatability".

Here's a download link also for the latest draft:

    http://www.virjacode.com/papers/relocatability.htm

The Kona meeting for trivial relocation is in six days' time . . .
Should I submit an 'issue' to the committee before then? I think the
ongoing disagreement and confusion about what the word 'trivial'
should mean is heavy enough to warrant submitting an issue.