What does this paper add to the existing body of papers, nb comments, and
discussion regarding what relocatable means?

Cheers,
Jeremy

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 11:00 Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 3:56 PM Brian Bi wrote:
> >
> > There is no need to submit another issue about "some people think that
> > relocatable means memcpyable". We already have national body comments
> > about that, which will be considered in Kona. In Kona there probably
> won't be
> > any time to consider any issues that are not national body comments.
>
>
> Are you telling me that I must ask the head of the British panel to
> put this forward for the Kona meeting next Wednesday?
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>