What does this paper add to the existing body of papers, nb comments, and discussion regarding what relocatable means?
Cheers,
Jeremy
On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 3:56 PM Brian Bi wrote:
>
> There is no need to submit another issue about "some people think that
> relocatable means memcpyable". We already have national body comments
> about that, which will be considered in Kona. In Kona there probably won't be
> any time to consider any issues that are not national body comments.
Are you telling me that I must ask the head of the British panel to
put this forward for the Kona meeting next Wednesday?
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals@lists.isocpp.org
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals