Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 14:37:03 +0000
On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 14:06, Ville Voutilainen via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 16:02, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
> Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > What are the semantics you're proposing? Are you proposing that
> > > the reserved name _Relocate have special meaning? (Why?)
> >
> >
> > I went with "_Relocate" because all underscore-followed-by-capital
> > names are restricted.
>
> "Restricted".. such names are reserved for the implementation, and
> can't be used for customization functions
> like in your proposal.
>
Right, if it's supposed to be a customization point that classes define, it
can't use a reserved name. Did you not notice that we don't do that
anywhere else in the standard?
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 at 16:02, Frederick Virchanza Gotham via
> Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > > What are the semantics you're proposing? Are you proposing that
> > > the reserved name _Relocate have special meaning? (Why?)
> >
> >
> > I went with "_Relocate" because all underscore-followed-by-capital
> > names are restricted.
>
> "Restricted".. such names are reserved for the implementation, and
> can't be used for customization functions
> like in your proposal.
>
Right, if it's supposed to be a customization point that classes define, it
can't use a reserved name. Did you not notice that we don't do that
anywhere else in the standard?
Received on 2025-10-31 14:37:19
