Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:15:28 +0100
>From the view of the C++ object it is trivial. It does not have to provide custom standard member functions.
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von:Frederick Virchanza Gotham via Std-Proposals <std-proposals_at_[hidden]>
Gesendet:Do 30.10.2025 18:15
Betreff:Re: [std-proposals] Replace an object -- but retain old object if new object fails to construct
An:std-proposals_at_[hidden];
CC:Frederick Virchanza Gotham <cauldwell.thomas_at_[hidden]>;
On Thursday, October 30, 2025, Thiago Macieira via Std-Proposals wrote:
We're just not going to use the feature. It's not the first time we ignore a
Standard feature because we think we can do something better and will not be
the last.
I'm dumbfounded that there are some people here who think that invoking an encryption algorithm is 'trivial'. Utterly dumbfounded.
--
Std-Proposals mailing list
Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
Received on 2025-10-30 17:28:46