std-discussion

Saturday, 27 November 2021

• Re: Access level for defaulted comparison operators Richard Hazlewood

Wednesday, 24 November 2021

• Re: Access level for defaulted comparison operators Lénárd Szolnoki
• Re: Access level for defaulted comparison operators Jason McKesson
• Access level for defaulted comparison operators Richard Hazlewood

Tuesday, 23 November 2021

• std::ranges::for_each with execution policy JIMMY HU

Saturday, 13 November 2021

• Re: Defect of the C Standard within the section "The typedef specifier" Jens Maurer
• Defect of the C Standard within the section "The typedef specifier" Vladimir Grigoriev

Friday, 12 November 2021

• Re: Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Hani Deek
• Re: Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Jens Maurer
• Re: Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Barry Revzin
• Re: Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Jason McKesson
• Re: Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Jens Maurer
• Why is this code accepted by all compilers? Hani Deek

Thursday, 11 November 2021

• Re: Can we limit dependencies in a modularized std library Jason McKesson
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Yongwei Wu
• Can we limit dependencies in a modularized std library Peter Sommerlad (C++)

Tuesday, 9 November 2021

• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Jens Maurer
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Yongwei Wu
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Jens Maurer
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Yongwei Wu
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules language.lawyer_at
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Yongwei Wu

Monday, 8 November 2021

• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules language.lawyer_at
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules Yongwei Wu
• Re: Wording change about "base class type" in aliasing rules language.lawyer_at

Friday, 5 November 2021

• Re: :path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Hans Åberg
• HTTPS for open-std.org ? Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Edward Catmur
• Re: fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Andrey Semashev
• Re: fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Thiago Macieira
• Re: fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Andrey Semashev
• Re: fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Thiago Macieira

Thursday, 4 November 2021

• fs::path appenders have inconsistent behavior for UNC paths between OSes Andrey Semashev

Wednesday, 3 November 2021

• Re: Question regarding [c.math¶11] Matthew Woehlke

Tuesday, 2 November 2021

• Re: Question regarding [c.math¶11] Giuseppe D'Angelo
• Re: inout_ptr - inconsistent release() Doug Cook (WINDOWS)
• Question regarding [c.math¶11] Matthew Woehlke
• Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: inout_ptr - inconsistent release() JeanHeyd Meneide

Last message date: 2021-11-27 13:46:18