Corentin Jabot
- Re: CWG 2779: Restrictions on the ordinary literal encoding
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
- Re: QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
Hubert Tong
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-26 SG16 telecon
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-26 SG16 telecon
- Re: QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
- Re: QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
- Re: QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
- QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
- Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
Inbal Levi
- Re: SG9 (Ranges) Next Meeting - July 10th (today) - Online
- Re: SG9 (Ranges) Next Meeting - July 10th (today) - Online
Jens Maurer
- Re: CWG 2779: Restrictions on the ordinary literal encoding
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
Mark de Wever
Steve Downey
- Re: CWG 2779: Restrictions on the ordinary literal encoding
- Re: QoI for escaped formatting of non-Unicode-encoding strings: deployment overhead versus ideal behaviour
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
Tom Honermann
- CWG 2779: Restrictions on the ordinary literal encoding
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-26 SG16 telecon
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-26 SG16 telecon
- Agenda for the 2023-07-26 SG16 telecon
- SG16 meeting summary for June 7th, 2023
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-12 SG16 telecon
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-12 SG16 telecon
- Re: Agenda for the 2023-07-12 SG16 telecon
- Re: SG9 (Ranges) Next Meeting - July 10th (today) - Online
- Agenda for the 2023-07-12 SG16 telecon
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers
- Re: Request for discussion on C++ synchronization with WG 14 N3145: $ in Identifiers