Thanks for the clarification, Zach!

To be more accurate - for the Unicode proposal, we talked about having a
Unicode-specific implementation (renamed, as suggested).
But one possible implementation is to have a general one, with a
specialization for Unicode (or forwarding to the specific one), so I'm
still interested to know if there's an appetite/interest in a (possibly)
general utility :)


Best Regards,
Inbal Levi

ISO C++ LEWG Co-Chair, SG9 Chair & Israeli NB Chair
C++Now Program Chair & CoreC++ Conference Organizer


On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 at 17:35, Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> I don't think we had much support for moving
> unpack_iterator_and_sentinel out of std::uc (it's 100%
> Unicode-specific, and as Tomasz pointed out would be *very* difficult
> to make interoperable with anything else). However, we did discuss
> that it should get some Unicodiness in its name -- maybe be adding
> "utf" in there or similar.
>
> Zach
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 9:31 AM Inbal Levi <sinbal2l_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> > Minutes from the latest SG9 meeting appear here:
> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21telecons2023/P2728
> >
> > During the meeting, we've discussed P2728R5, and considered having the
> following two utils from the paper ported into the rangers namespace (names
> are tentative):
> >
> > borrowerd_transform_view (similar to transform_view, but able to extend
> the lifetime of the underline thing)
> > unpack_iterator_and_sentinel(ranges::begin(base_, ranges::end(base_))
> (able to "strip" unnecessary wrapping, to improve performance)
> >
> > (Tomasz/Zach will send a mail thread with the details of the proposed to
> the SG9 reflector)
> > I would love the group's input on this direction. CCing SG16, as I
> understood this was brought up there as well.
> >
> > Thanks all for joining and for the great feedback!
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Inbal Levi
> >
> > ISO C++ LEWG Co-Chair, SG9 Chair & Israeli NB Chair
> > C++Now Program Chair & CoreC++ Conference Organizer
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 at 17:20, Zach Laine <whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The latest revision is here:
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/P2728R5.html
> >>
> >> Zach
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 7:08 AM Inbal Levi <sinbal2l_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hello all,
> >> > I apologize for the late mail. As discussed in Varna, today we will
> continue reviewing the paper by Zach (9:30 Pacific, as usual):
> >> >
> >> > (Tentative) P2728R3: Unicode in the Library, Part 1: UTF Transcoding
> >> >
> >> > Meeting link:
> https://iso.zoom.us/j/94426994719?pwd=WnhNYVdvYWNrUzcvNEZPbStySTh6dz09
> >> > Password: as usual (please email me if you're unsure)
> >> >
> >> > See you soon!
> >> > Best Regards,
> >> > Inbal Levi
> >> >
> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> > Lead Software Engineer @ Millenium
> >> > Isocpp, Boost &"Hamakor" Non-Profits Board Member
> >> > ISO C++ LEWG Co-Chair, SG9 Chair & Israeli NB Chair
> >> > C++Now Program Chair & CoreC++ Conference Organizer
> >> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>