This meeting is starting now.

Tom.

On 7/12/23 11:39 AM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
>
> This is your friendly reminder that this meeting is taking place
> *today* (in just under 4 hours).
>
> Tom.
>
> On 7/10/23 6:28 PM, Tom Honermann via SG16 wrote:
>>
>> SG16 will hold a telecon on Wednesday, July 12th, at 19:30 UTC
>> (timezone conversion
>> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20230712T193000&p1=1440&p2=tz_pt&p3=tz_mt&p4=tz_ct&p5=tz_et&p6=tz_cest>).
>>
>> The agenda follows.
>>
>> * P1030R5: std::filesystem::path_view <https://wg21.link/p1030r5>
>> o Discuss what to do in lieu of overloads with std::locale
>> parameters.
>> * P2845R0: Formatting of std::filesystem::path
>> <https://wg21.link/p2845r0>
>> o Continue review.
>> * LWG 3944: Formatters converting sequences of char to sequences of
>> wchar_t <https://wg21.link/lwg3944>
>> o Initial review.
>>
>> SG16 has discussed P1030 on several occasions including the
>> 2018-05-30 telecon
>> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings/blob/master/README-2018.md#may-30th-2018>,
>> in Cologne
>> <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/SG16P1030R2>, and in
>> Belfast <https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21belfast/SG16P1030R3>.
>> Niall recently requested
>> <https://lists.isocpp.org/sg16/2023/06/3887.php> additional SG16
>> review following LEWG's request to remove overloads with a
>> std::locale parameter that were added in P1030R4
>> <https://wg21.link/p1030r4> (which SG16 has not reviewed) during
>> LEWG's review of P1030R5 in Varna
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BNVW8yueHEmt_ME0Zeov4hZAsOu6fJh72rIL-OQ-VTU/edit#heading=h.3p10iohmm37x>.
>> The minutes are not perfectly clear, but it appears that at least one
>> of the concerns is the presence of std::locale parameters on
>> functions declared with constexpr; which doesn't make a lot of sense.
>> I'm sure Niall, Victor, or Zach can provide more details; they were
>> all in attendance. Our discussion goal will be determine if there is
>> strong motivation to argue in favor of preserving support for
>> std::locale (with any necessary ancillary changes), or whether we
>> agree with LEWG, or whether there is an alternative solution we would
>> prefer to promote.
>>
>> We discussed P2845R0 at our 2023-06-07 telecon
>> <https://github.com/sg16-unicode/sg16-meetings#june-7th-2023> (which
>> I have yet to publish a meeting summary for; I'm sorry; I'm working
>> on it; that link will work eventually). We did not finish that
>> discussion or poll any aspects of the paper, so we'll continue our
>> review with this meeting.
>>
>> If time permits, we'll start discussing LWG 3944
>> <https://wg21.link/lwg3944>. The issue concerns handling of ranges of
>> type char when formatting for wchar_t.
>>
>> Tom.
>>
>