Alan Dayton
Andre Kostur
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
Andrey Semashev
Arthur O'Dwyer
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Chrono API provokes errors
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
Avi Kivity
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- [std-proposals] Literal ranges
Bjorn Reese
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Bo Persson
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Breno Guimarães
Brian Bi
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-forwarding environment queries in sender/receiver
- Re: [std-proposals] Unclear wording about corresponding overloads
Chris Ryan
Christof Meerwald
Daniel Eiband
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-forwarding environment queries in sender/receiver
- Re: [std-proposals] Non-forwarding environment queries in sender/receiver
Dmitrii Shabalin
- Re: [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
Donald Duck
Ehsan Amiri
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
Ell
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Fady al Dhaim
Federico Kircheis
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Filip
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
Frederick Virchanza Gotham
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- [std-proposals] P2287R4 Designated initializers for Base Classes - Double Colon
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
Giuseppe D'Angelo
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
Hans Åberg
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Henning Meyer
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
Henry Miller
Hewill Kang
Howard Hinnant
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
Ivan Lazaric
Ivan Matek
Jan Schultke
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Jarrad Waterloo
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Jason McKesson
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- [std-proposals] Fwd: unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
Jens Maurer
- Re: [std-proposals] P2287R4 Designated initializers for Base Classes - Double Colon
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Jeremy Rifkin
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Jerome Saint-Martin
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
JJ Marr
JOHN MORRISON
Jonathan Wakely
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] [std-proposal] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster pow for integral exponents?
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster pow for integral exponents?
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Allow forward declaring typedefs
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Chrono API provokes errors
- Re: [std-proposals] Chrono API provokes errors
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
Julien Villemure-Fréchette
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Allow forward declaring typedefs
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
Keenan Horrigan
lh gkjhg
Lénárd Szolnoki
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Marc Edouard Gauthier
Marcin Jaczewski
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
Matheus Izvekov
Muhammad
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
Nikl Kelbon
Nikolaos D. Bougalis
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Oliver Hunt
organicoman
Paul Keir
Pavel Vazharov
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Peter Bindels
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
Phil Endecott
Robin Savonen Söderholm
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Faster pow for integral exponents?
- [std-proposals] Faster pow for integral exponents?
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Allow forward declaring typedefs
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Ryan Klaus
Samuel Alonso Rodríguez
Sebastian Wittmeier
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes (was: Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions)
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] Ignoring attributes
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ ? Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Pseudo const answer
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- [std-proposals] compile time execution environment
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] Safer API for minmax with friends?
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Simon Schröder
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] User defined decay operator
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Stewart Becker
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- [std-proposals] Suggeting improvements to std::expected<T, std::exception_ptr>
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Thiago Macieira
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] [std-proposal] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Type modifier to disable integer promotion
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] #pragma once safer alternative
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Making The auto Keyword Optional in Trailing Return Types
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Providing information about data structures to the compiler
- Re: [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] for loop enhancement
- Re: [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
Tiago Freire
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] [std-proposal] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] Floating an idea: [[no_address]] for functions.
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Standardizing doc comments
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal Idea: with Block for C++ – Extending Object Scope
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] Proposal: Allow forward declaring typedefs
- Re: [std-proposals] enum with non-integral types
- Re: [std-proposals] Random numbers in identical builds
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] Chrono API provokes errors
- Re: [std-proposals] Chrono API provokes errors
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Tom Honermann
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
- Re: [std-proposals] constexpr support for std::chrono::system_clock
Tony V E
Tymi
- Re: [std-proposals] [std-proposal] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] [std-proposal] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- [std-proposals] std::wprint/std::wprintln
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
- [std-proposals] [[pure]] attribute
Vaibhav Parate
Ville Voutilainen
- Re: [std-proposals] Allow assert in constexpr functions
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute
- Re: [std-proposals] std::function with default arguments
Zhihao Yuan
- Re: [std-proposals] lambdas in enums
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges
- Re: [std-proposals] Literal ranges