Please provide a specific concrete example of this in play to showcase how
this attribute would be significantly better than all of the existing
alternatives.

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 3:05 PM Hans Åberg via Std-Proposals <
std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Allowing for compiler diagnostic, and can be overridden, not relying
> solely on the linker to detect errors.
>
>
> > On 18 Mar 2025, at 22:40, Sebastian Wittmeier via Std-Proposals <
> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > AW: [std-proposals] unimplemented attribute body { font-family: Arial,
> Verdana, Sans-Serif ! important; font-size: 12px; padding: 5px 5px 5px 5px;
> margin: 0px; border-style: none; background-color: #ffffff; } p, ul, li {
> margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; } So the header marks a usage as
> dubious and the compiler outputs a warning diagnostics.
> >
> > During linking it is decided, whether the symbol actually exists.
> Linking succeeds or fails, based on that?
> >
> > Is this the gist of it?
>
>
> --
> Std-Proposals mailing list
> Std-Proposals_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/std-proposals
>