Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2025 10:48:13 +0100
> On 21 Mar 2025, at 10:36, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 10:17, Hans Åberg via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> No, it is for compiler writers to mark what is not implemented, instead of doing nothing or using “delete”. See the example I gave upthread.
>
> If a compiler writer wanted a facility like this, they would already
> be using it.
Indeed, we haven't heard anything from any actual C++ compiler writers in this thread I would think. So it is pretty theoretical. Somebody else initiated this thread, and I responded because I happened to have seen some cases where it might be useful. It would be funny, though, if ending up in the standard.
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 10:17, Hans Åberg via Std-Proposals
> <std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> No, it is for compiler writers to mark what is not implemented, instead of doing nothing or using “delete”. See the example I gave upthread.
>
> If a compiler writer wanted a facility like this, they would already
> be using it.
Indeed, we haven't heard anything from any actual C++ compiler writers in this thread I would think. So it is pretty theoretical. Somebody else initiated this thread, and I responded because I happened to have seen some cases where it might be useful. It would be funny, though, if ending up in the standard.
Received on 2025-03-21 09:48:28