Well, whatever it is, I definitely want that. I don't mind scheduling it
for a later version of C++, as I understand it will take implementers and
committee time and that might put C++26 away in time. I suggest I write a
draft, and then we can vote & refine.

Tymi.

On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 7:42 PM Tymi <tymi.cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> We can schedule it for C++29 then [image: 🥺]
>
> On Sun, Mar 30, 2025 at 7:38 PM Jonathan Wakely <cxx_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2025, 11:59 Tymi via Std-Proposals, <
>> std-proposals_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> It wouldn't harm anyone if it was in C++,
>>>
>>
>> Apart from the implementers who have to do it for you, and everybody who
>> has to wait for other features to be implemented because that has to be
>> done.
>>
>> And the people who have to maintain the spec.
>>
>> Every addition to the standard has a cost.
>>
>>
>> also generally it would make sense to complete std::print by adding wide
>>> string support.
>>>
>>>