ISOCPP Std Discussion List: by date

To subscribe or unsubscribe to this list (or change your subscription options), see the list information page.

Thursday, 31 December 2020

Wednesday, 30 December 2020

Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Hani Deek
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Hani Deek
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? jim x
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? jim x
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Hani Deek
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? jim x
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Vishal Oza
Re: Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Lénárd Szolnoki

Tuesday, 29 December 2020

Why does overload resolution fail in this simple case? Hani Deek
std::hash (partial) specialization for std::tuple and std::pair? Shachar Shemesh

Tuesday, 22 December 2020

Re: Where should I look for the CWG Issue? Gennaro Prota
Re: Where should I look for the CWG Issue? language.lawyer_at

Monday, 21 December 2020

Re: What's the usage of type_identity? Peter Sommerlad (C++)

Saturday, 19 December 2020

Re: In value-initialization, why does a (unselected) user-provided or deleted default constructor prevent zero-init? Tam S. B.

Friday, 18 December 2020

What's the usage of type_identity? Akira Takahashi

Saturday, 12 December 2020

Re: Aggregate elements Vladimir Grigoriev
Re: In value-initialization, why does a (unselected) user-provided or deleted default constructor prevent zero-init? Jason McKesson
In value-initialization, why does a (unselected) user-provided or deleted default constructor prevent zero-init? Tam S. B.

Friday, 11 December 2020

Re: Aggregate elements Jason Cobb
Re: Aggregate elements Vladimir Grigoriev

Thursday, 10 December 2020

Re: [temp.spec.general] ¶6 - "The usual access checking rules do not apply ..." Jason McKesson
Re: [temp.spec.general] ¶6 - "The usual access checking rules do not apply ..." Hyman Rosen
[temp.spec.general] ¶6 - "The usual access checking rules do not apply ..." David Bakin

Tuesday, 8 December 2020

auto& NTTP and type equivalence Lénárd Szolnoki
Re: Pointer-interconvertibility between a standard-layout non-empty class object and its empty base class subobject Kazutoshi Satoda
Pointer-interconvertibility between a standard-layout non-empty class object and its empty base class subobject Kazutoshi Satoda

Monday, 7 December 2020

Disambiguation about constructor declaration seems underspecified (to say the least) Tam S. B.

Last message date: 2020-12-31 10:30:20