C++ Logo


Advanced search

Re: [SG16] 1854R1 - Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning

From: Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 21:23:32 +0200
On 23/09/2021 17.34, Corentin via SG16 wrote:
> For the sake of everyone's time and also because merging the wording would have been a hassle,
> I've decided to merge into this paper making non-basic characters ill-formed in multi character literals
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf <https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf>

In table 1 "character literals", the entire row
"non-encodable ordinary character literal" is removed.
However, in the column "associated character encoding",
the struck words need to stay.


Received on 2021-09-23 14:23:58