C++ Logo

sg16

Advanced search

Re: [SG16] 1854R1 - Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning

From: Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2021 08:59:33 +0200
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 9:23 PM Jens Maurer <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> On 23/09/2021 17.34, Corentin via SG16 wrote:
> > For the sake of everyone's time and also because merging the wording
> would have been a hassle,
> > I've decided to merge into this paper making non-basic characters
> ill-formed in multi character literals
> >
> > https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf <
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf>
>
> In table 1 "character literals", the entire row
> "non-encodable ordinary character literal" is removed.
> However, in the column "associated character encoding",
> the struck words need to stay.
>

Yes it does,
thanks


>
> Jens
>

Received on 2021-09-24 01:59:47