Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:34:03 +0200
For the sake of everyone's time and also because merging the wording would
have been a hassle,
I've decided to merge into this paper making non-basic characters
ill-formed in multi character literals
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf
These would be ill-formed https://godbolt.org/z/cahxPo6K8
Regards,
Corentin
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 2:03 PM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please find this fresh off-the-press revision of
> "Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning"
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf
>
> This paper was previously reviewed in Belfast under the name
> "Conversion to execution encoding should not lead to loss of meaning"
>
> The motivation has been expended and the wording rebased on top of the
> current standard
> (Jens modifications not applied yet)
>
> Thanks,
> Corentin
>
have been a hassle,
I've decided to merge into this paper making non-basic characters
ill-formed in multi character literals
https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf
These would be ill-formed https://godbolt.org/z/cahxPo6K8
Regards,
Corentin
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 2:03 PM Corentin <corentin.jabot_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please find this fresh off-the-press revision of
> "Conversion to literal encoding should not lead to loss of meaning"
> https://isocpp.org/files/papers/D1854R1.pdf
>
> This paper was previously reviewed in Belfast under the name
> "Conversion to execution encoding should not lead to loss of meaning"
>
> The motivation has been expended and the wording rebased on top of the
> current standard
> (Jens modifications not applied yet)
>
> Thanks,
> Corentin
>
Received on 2021-09-23 10:34:17