C++ Logo

sg15

Advanced search

Re: [isocpp-sg15] [isocpp-sg21] [isocpp-admin] Swedish mirror committee consideration on the current working draft

From: Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:29:24 +0300
On Fri, 26 Sept 2025 at 11:23, Timur Doumler <cpp_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On 26 Sep 2025, at 11:18, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Nice shpiel. It misses the fact that many of those language features
> had implementation and deployment experience far beyond what contracts
> have, well before they were standardized,
>
>
> Which language features specifically?
>
> Then there's the various significants and atscales, which aren't
> necessarily what we're even talking about when desperately requesting
> features
> to have deployment experience before they are adopted.
>
>
> Could you please clarify what scale of deployment experience you would consider sufficient and how to quantify that?

Those are not the topic of this discussion.

Received on 2025-09-26 08:29:37