Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 11:23:10 +0300
> On 26 Sep 2025, at 11:18, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilainen_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Nice shpiel. It misses the fact that many of those language features
> had implementation and deployment experience far beyond what contracts
> have, well before they were standardized,
Which language features specifically?
> Then there's the various significants and atscales, which aren't
> necessarily what we're even talking about when desperately requesting
> features
> to have deployment experience before they are adopted.
Could you please clarify what scale of deployment experience you would consider sufficient and how to quantify that?
Thanks,
Timur
> Nice shpiel. It misses the fact that many of those language features
> had implementation and deployment experience far beyond what contracts
> have, well before they were standardized,
Which language features specifically?
> Then there's the various significants and atscales, which aren't
> necessarily what we're even talking about when desperately requesting
> features
> to have deployment experience before they are adopted.
Could you please clarify what scale of deployment experience you would consider sufficient and how to quantify that?
Thanks,
Timur
Received on 2025-09-26 08:23:14