Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 20:34:24 +0200
Thanks a lot to everyone for the feedback, and also for the help I
received on how to proceed!
As suggested, I created a paper, which I will reference in a comment on
the current working draft at our NB.
The paper number is P3849R0.
I am especially thankful to the experts who agreed to discuss this topic
with our NB in an online session.
*I would also like to invite participants from other national bodies to
join this discussion*. Given the tight timeline, there are limited date
options, but I will submit suggestions as soon as possible, most likely
at the end of week 42 or the beginning of week 43.
I have also asked the ecostd group for a discussion on this topic,
including experts from SG21.
I hope these efforts will lead to productive and valuable outcomes, and
I apologize if my initiative has caused any inconvenience.
/Harald
On 2025-09-24 13:10, Harald Achitz via Admin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The Swedish SC22 mirror committee TK611/AG09 has discussed the current
> working draft of C++26 and identified concerns regarding contract
> assertions. We have summarized these in the attached document.
>
> As convener, I see it as my duty to mediate these concerns. I would
> therefore appreciate guidance on how to proceed and to ensure that our
> experts’ concerns, as well as similar concerns from others, are taken
> into account.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Best regards,
> Harald
> Convener, SIS/TK611/AG09 (Sweden)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Admin mailing list
> Admin_at_[hidden]
> Subscription:https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/admin
> Link to this post:http://lists.isocpp.org/admin/2025/09/2391.php
received on how to proceed!
As suggested, I created a paper, which I will reference in a comment on
the current working draft at our NB.
The paper number is P3849R0.
I am especially thankful to the experts who agreed to discuss this topic
with our NB in an online session.
*I would also like to invite participants from other national bodies to
join this discussion*. Given the tight timeline, there are limited date
options, but I will submit suggestions as soon as possible, most likely
at the end of week 42 or the beginning of week 43.
I have also asked the ecostd group for a discussion on this topic,
including experts from SG21.
I hope these efforts will lead to productive and valuable outcomes, and
I apologize if my initiative has caused any inconvenience.
/Harald
On 2025-09-24 13:10, Harald Achitz via Admin wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The Swedish SC22 mirror committee TK611/AG09 has discussed the current
> working draft of C++26 and identified concerns regarding contract
> assertions. We have summarized these in the attached document.
>
> As convener, I see it as my duty to mediate these concerns. I would
> therefore appreciate guidance on how to proceed and to ensure that our
> experts’ concerns, as well as similar concerns from others, are taken
> into account.
>
> Thank you for your help.
>
> Best regards,
> Harald
> Convener, SIS/TK611/AG09 (Sweden)
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Admin mailing list
> Admin_at_[hidden]
> Subscription:https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/admin
> Link to this post:http://lists.isocpp.org/admin/2025/09/2391.php
Received on 2025-09-27 18:34:30