Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:57:20 -0500
On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 08:36 Bret Brown <mail_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> it would be nice to reuse field names, types, and semantics across these
> metadata files (such as the module scanning response file) whenever
> possible, in order to avoid accidental complexity to the C++ ecosystem as a
> whole.
>
It may be the case that we can get away with under specifying it for now.
Do we already have a scenario where we would have local arguments for the
standard library?
If not, we can skip the "local-arguments" field in the first revision.
Daniel
> it would be nice to reuse field names, types, and semantics across these
> metadata files (such as the module scanning response file) whenever
> possible, in order to avoid accidental complexity to the C++ ecosystem as a
> whole.
>
It may be the case that we can get away with under specifying it for now.
Do we already have a scenario where we would have local arguments for the
standard library?
If not, we can skip the "local-arguments" field in the first revision.
Daniel
Received on 2023-12-13 15:57:32