No, we are not special.

That said, if the review is purely to integrate what we already discussed and approved and the review contents are purely editorial, then a github review sounds good to me. If we were to do more than that, then usual operational rules apply.

-- Gaby

________________________________
From: SG15 <sg15-bounces_at_[hidden]> on behalf of Ðí´«Ææ(Ò¹µÆ) via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2023 7:16:48 PM
To: Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Cc: Ðí´«Ææ(Ò¹µÆ) <chuanqi.xcq_at_[hidden]>
Subject: Re: [SG15] P2898R1 - Build System Requirements for Importable Headers

Not specifically for this proposal, I prefer to review on Github, , as it would make our work more transparent to people outside of WG21. I know there are policies in WG21. I am just wondering if SG15 is special. (e.g., the mail list of sg15 is more visible than other mail lists)

Thanks,
Chuanqi

------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Send Time:2023 Aug. 30 (Wed.) 03:10
To:sg15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
Cc:Daniel Ruoso <daniel_at_[hidden]>
Subject:[SG15] P2898R1 - Build System Requirements for Importable Headers

Hi,

We discussed this paper in Varna, and we had significant progress.

I have a PR on the modules ecosystem TR draft to incorporate the items we discussed.

https://github.com/cplusplus/modules-ecosystem-tr/pull/26

To the best of my knowledge this is essentially just encoding the consensus we achieved in that meeting.

Do you all think we should have a meeting to review it? Or is the review in GitHub itself sufficient?

Daniel