Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 02:29:32 -0700
I'm fine with handling this via github as it's just applying what we
already agreed to. It would be good for people to take a look editorially
and to verify it matches their understanding of the consensus. I will try
to take a closer look this week, but encourage others to also take a look.
- Michael Spencer
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:10 PM Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <
sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discussed this paper in Varna, and we had significant progress.
>
> I have a PR on the modules ecosystem TR draft to incorporate the items we
> discussed.
>
> https://github.com/cplusplus/modules-ecosystem-tr/pull/26
>
> To the best of my knowledge this is essentially just encoding the
> consensus we achieved in that meeting.
>
> Do you all think we should have a meeting to review it? Or is the review
> in GitHub itself sufficient?
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
already agreed to. It would be good for people to take a look editorially
and to verify it matches their understanding of the consensus. I will try
to take a closer look this week, but encourage others to also take a look.
- Michael Spencer
On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 12:10 PM Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <
sg15_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We discussed this paper in Varna, and we had significant progress.
>
> I have a PR on the modules ecosystem TR draft to incorporate the items we
> discussed.
>
> https://github.com/cplusplus/modules-ecosystem-tr/pull/26
>
> To the best of my knowledge this is essentially just encoding the
> consensus we achieved in that meeting.
>
> Do you all think we should have a meeting to review it? Or is the review
> in GitHub itself sufficient?
>
> Daniel
>
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
Received on 2023-08-30 09:29:49