Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 09:08:32 -0700
I'm really glad to hear the discussion's been fruitful as its felt really
difficult/stalled/hard to find shared understanding for a while - thanks to
everyone for talking this through.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:07 AM Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a new revision of the paper I submitted a couple of weeks ago. I
> had several conversations with several people on this topic.
>
> The good news is that I found a set of things we can do to make this work.
> For that reason I decided to rename the paper, since although it has most
> of the same content for context, the conclusion is now radically different.
>
> Thanks for all that helped me figure this out. I'm mildly convinced we can
> make this work...
>
> https://wg21.link/p2898r1 for the paper.
>
> daniel
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
difficult/stalled/hard to find shared understanding for a while - thanks to
everyone for talking this through.
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 8:07 AM Daniel Ruoso via SG15 <sg15_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a new revision of the paper I submitted a couple of weeks ago. I
> had several conversations with several people on this topic.
>
> The good news is that I found a set of things we can do to make this work.
> For that reason I decided to rename the paper, since although it has most
> of the same content for context, the conclusion is now radically different.
>
> Thanks for all that helped me figure this out. I'm mildly convinced we can
> make this work...
>
> https://wg21.link/p2898r1 for the paper.
>
> daniel
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>
Received on 2023-06-12 16:08:45