Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 11:41:36 -0400
On 21/06/2021 11.33, Isabella Muerte via SG15 wrote:
> As you are the author of CPS, I'd recommend writing an actual JSON
> Schema to verify against versus this very bizarre RFC 822 style
> thing you've done here. It was not immediately obvious reading the
> schema documentation that CPS is JSON until you look at the
> documented example file
Strictly speaking, that's because CPS is a *schema*, not a file format.
Conceivably, you could implement it on top of, say, XML. Using JSON is
*recommended* (and more-or-less assumed), but not explicitly required.
> As you are the author of CPS, I'd recommend writing an actual JSON
> Schema to verify against versus this very bizarre RFC 822 style
> thing you've done here. It was not immediately obvious reading the
> schema documentation that CPS is JSON until you look at the
> documented example file
Strictly speaking, that's because CPS is a *schema*, not a file format.
Conceivably, you could implement it on top of, say, XML. Using JSON is
*recommended* (and more-or-less assumed), but not explicitly required.
-- Matthew
Received on 2021-06-21 10:41:39