On Mon, Jun 21, 2021, at 08:29, Matthew Woehlke via SG15 wrote:
> On 18/06/2021 19.19, David Blaikie via SG15 wrote:
>
> Another point in favor of CPS: it's JSON. The format recommended by
> P1689 is also JSON. This means that, at least at a lexical level, only
> one parser — and one which is widely available across many languages —
> is needed for both formats. This would not be the case with pkg-config.
>
> (¹ https://mwoehlke.github.io/cps/)

As you are the author of CPS, I'd recommend writing an actual JSON Schema to verify against versus this very bizarre RFC 822 style thing you've done here. It was not immediately obvious reading the schema documentation that CPS is JSON until you look at the documented example file

> --
> Matthew
> _______________________________________________
> SG15 mailing list
> SG15_at_[hidden] <mailto:SG15%40lists.isocpp.org>
> https://lists.isocpp.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/sg15
>